March 16, 2026: State’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Rule 19 Petition for Extraordinary Relief 

The state filed a response opposing the plaintiffs’ request for extraordinary relief from the Utah Supreme Court, arguing that there’s no urgent reason to step in, the plaintiffs can raise their arguments through the normal court process, the law creating the panel is valid, and recent changes to the law mean some of the plaintiffs’ arguments no longer apply. 

Previous
Previous

March 18, 2026: District Court Grants Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings

Next
Next

February 27, 2026: Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint